[[PIE morphology MOC]] # PIE conjugation Verbs were conjugated for tense/[[PIE mood|mood]], [[PIE voice|voice]], [[PIE aspect|aspect]], as well as the [[PIE person system|person]] and [[PIE grammatical number|number]] of the subject. In strict PIE these were almost exclusively reflected by single polyfunctional morphemes (endings) in a similar vain to [[PIE declension]], which was inherited unchanged by the Anatolian branch. ```txt root + ending \____verb___/ ``` By Nuclear IE the derivational affixes previously used for converting verbs from one [[PIE aspect|aspect]] to another had become more inflectional. Similarly, the innovative subjunctive and optative moods were reflected by affixes, yielding the following structure. ```txt root + aspect? + mood? + ending \________stem________/ / \____________verb___________/ ``` Some reconstruct the so-called **augment** prefix <em class="recon">é-</em> for Central IE, but Ringe argues this did not exist for any ancestor of [[Proto-Germanic]].[^intro] [^intro]: 2017, [[@ringeProtoIndoEuropeanProtoGermanic2017|From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic]], p. 30 In general, PIE conjugation had two phases 1. [[PIE verb stem formation]] encoding aspect and later mood 2. [[PIE verb endings]] encoding everything else Ringe notes that the thematic stem inflections would have been easier to learn, and certainly the majority of verbs became thematic in Proto-Germanic.[^foreshadowing] [^forshadowing]: 2017, [[@ringeProtoIndoEuropeanProtoGermanic2017|From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic]], p. 49 ## Core IE paradigm architecture - Verbs with only one aspect stem — Always unaffixed. - Verbs with two or three aspect stems — One unaffixed aspect, the rest affixed. - Derived verbs — Only imperfective, always affixed.[^par] | imperfective | perfective | stative | | ---------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------- | | <em class="recon">h₁és-ti</em> ‘is’ | — | — | | <em class="recon">wés-tor</em> ‘is wearing’ | — | — | | <em class="recon">h₂áǵe-ti</em> ‘is driving’ | — | — | | — | <em class="recon">bʰúH-t</em> ‘became’ | — | | — | <em class="recon">h₁ludʰé-d</em> ‘arrived’ | — | | — | — | <em class="recon">wóyd-e</em> ‘knows’ | | <em class="recon">dʰé-dʰeh₁-ti</em> ‘is putting’ | <em class="recon">dʰéh₁-t</em> ‘put’ | | | <em class="recon">stí-stah₂-ti</em> ‘is getting up’ | <em class="recon">stáh₂-t</em> ‘stood up’ | <em class="recon">ste-stoh₂-a</em> ‘is standing’ | | <em class="recon">tḷ-nah₂-ti</em> ‘is lifting’ | <em class="recon">télh₂-t</em> ‘lifted’ | <em class="recon">te-tólh₂-a</em> ‘is holding up’ | | <em class="recon">sí-sde-ti</em> ‘is getting seated’ | <em class="recon">séds-t</em>[^s] ‘sat down’ | — | | <em class="recon">gʷṃ-ské-ti</em> ‘is walking’ | <em class="recon">gʷém-d</em> ‘stepped’ | <em class="recon">gʷe-gʷóm-e</em> ‘has the feet in place’ | | <em class="recon">ǵṇh₁-yé-tor</em> ‘is being born’ | <em class="recon">ǵṇh₁-tó</em> ‘was born’ | <em class="recon">ǵe-gónh₁-e</em> ‘is … years old’ | | <em class="recon">wér-ye-ti</em> ‘is saying’ | <em class="recon">wérh₁-t</em> ‘said’ | — | | <em class="recon">déyḱ-ti</em> ‘is pointing out’ | <em class="recon">déyk-s-t</em> ‘pointed out’ | — | | <em class="recon">wéǵʰe-ti</em> ‘is transporting” | <em class="recon">wégʰ-s-t</em> ‘transported’ | — | | <em class="recon">wérts-ti</em> ‘is turning’ | — | <em class="recon">we-wórt-e</em> ‘is turned toward’ | | — | <em class="recon">h₂néḱ-t</em> ‘reached’ | <em class="recon">h₂a-h₂nóḱ-e</em> ‘extends to’ | [^par]: 2017, [[@ringeProtoIndoEuropeanProtoGermanic2017|From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic]], p. 42 [^s]: Notice the [[PIE *s insertion]]. ## Conjugations - [[Proto-Central IE sample conjugations]] # --- #state/tidy | #lang/en | #SemBr